Note: This writing is part of the
Coins That Shatter the Mirror cluster, reposted from my earlier archives as part of the
BetweenSparks project.
Read the full cluster on Wattpad.
*poem and statement
*Inspired slightly by Ishmael by Daniel Quinn
______________
History of Our Path:
A moment of instancy, gliding into prehistory,
Only a squatter based upon plunder.
Descendants of ancient sapians; ideological immaterialians.
Generations paved decay, began to material away.
Over time loss of pathism values; atomizing individualisms.
The Materialian Reign:
The instancy of the moment, winded by contradictory.
Plunder our lineage in hopes of kingship and power;
Supremacist knowledge. Disregard modern moralians,
New ways of infinitely being astray...
Social individuality. Generation-less Me. Selfism.
___________________________________
*Go back to the source of the oldest written path, way or discipline. Go
back to many different ones. There are common threads, explore them.
You'll know they are ethical threads and overtime have overlapped
consistently - especially with the fact, we do not practice them as
living, breathing individuals in our moral decision making. To be truly
ethical, is to know the history of ethical contemplation and philosophy
- many ancient, modern and contemporary philosophers will wear the mask
of historian. To think 'ethics' is to not solely think about morals,
but the objective paradoxes that come out of moral dilemmas. There is
no question, objective morals exist: no ONE person can say genocide or
random killing is GOOD. This means, we are born with a basic moral map
to be ethical with others.
We have grown to believe we are able to leave ethics to ethicist, and
the philosophy to philosophers. We are all equipped with the ability to
be self aware of our own individual circumstances and environments as
well as the circumstance of others - at least a great deal of people.
Now more than ever with the internet (and other techno-progressions),
can we learn about others behave, think and believe. Sources are a
question of concern, but at least with multiple sources there is more
knowledge of relative data that may make some sources look poor or
better.
Ethics... Is not the main issue. But at the same time it is.
The problem with our current day standards of living, is the belief we
are destined for better standards of living... The 'we' being
individual, but, sometimes meant to mean 'all of us'.
No comments:
Post a Comment